Right_2_Write

NANAK TERA YA MERA Nanak tera, ya nanak mera, nanak iska, ya nanak uska. जिस गंदगी से निकाल कर नानक हमें बंदगी की ओर ले के गए थे, हम आज फिर उसी गंदगी को छूने के लिए भाग रहे हैं । From the briefings of historians, one thing comes out clearly about Nanak, that he belonged to every one but no one. There are two statements that can be made about Nanak. 1). He was neither a muslim, nor a hindu. He started sikhism 2). He was everyone muslim, hindu,and all castes at the same time. I would love to believe in the second statement, because for me, the second statement clearly doesnt discards any faith. It accepts all the faiths and yet is directioned only towards ek-onkar, allah, one god. This he clearly proved from his writings and compilations, closeness with Bhagat Kabir Ji, travelling to Mecca, Kashi and all around the joined world. I read that Nanak read Namaaz in Iraq and shlokas in Kashi and proved the being a pandit or a learned qaazi is not enough. Being everyone and yet...

SEARCHING FOR MY FINGERPRINT wondering, wondering, i am just wondering, how can i write what i want to convey or may be what i feel. Who the hell am i to convey anything to anyone. i just want to share what i feel. And the most interesting thing is that i try to define what i feel. Isnt this similar to someone trying to explain GOD. You explain him and you diminish(what should be the right word) his very own existence. Something which can be explained or is define-able has to be measurable, than how can it be God. All the religions/communities with common beliefs try to explain or even the spokespersons of these religions actually explain God. Now that is contradictory. It is good to talk about him, to feel him, to be him. But the spokespersons giving a verdict are weird. Actually i find them weird. May be they are not, but i dont become synchronous with them, As they try to take away my freedom by defining God at first stage and then defining the rules for me to m...